Happy Anniversary, Connecticut

One year ago today, I stood in the Governor’s office and watched him make history. With his signature, Connecticut became the seventeenth state in the country to abolish the death penalty.

I was there with other victim family members, activists from the community, members of the clergy, and Senators and Representatives who had sponsored the bill and supported it through the process. We were all very happy that we were part of the occasion. It meant a great deal to all of us, each for our own reasons.

I’d been in the gallery when the Senate voted to pass the bill and again when the House of Representatives voted to pass the bill. On both occasions I was elated and happy. I felt that all the hard work so many had done for so long had finally paid off. I felt a sense of accomplishment.

As I’ve written before, I felt overwhelmed with entirely different emotions in the Governor’s office on April 25, 2012. I was proud, so very proud that I was a citizen of Connecticut. I was so proud to be a citizen of a state that no longer killed in my name. I was relieved that I need not bear the guilt that the state had spread over all its citizens because we left in place a law that allowed the state to kill in our name. I was proud and relieved because, finally, the State of Connecticut proclaimed that killing is wrong–whether it be a convicted murderer or my mother. I felt that the State understood that murder is a heinous crime–no matter who commits the murder.

It meant the world to me.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Speaking Out is Hard

During the last week of October, I was in Montana, with the Montana Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty. I’m just now beginning to feel normal again. A trip like that requires recuperation.

I’ve thought a lot about the toll speaking about my mother’s murder, the subsequent trials, and re-forming my opposition to the death penalty has taken. The trials and soul-searching are pretty much complete, but now I choose to speak about my mother and about my experience in the Connecticut Judicial system. This still causes me much angst. I thought and thought about why that should still be, and I believe I’ve finally begun to understand. Here’s what I think –

At some point during the grieving process I decided that I would not let myself or my young children become victims of the man who murdered my mother. It seemed to me if I remained mired in anger, hatred and guilt I would bring my children to that terrible place, and we would all become additional victims of my mother’s murder. I’m a stubborn and independent person who, at that time, had previously escaped from an abusive marriage and I renewed my vow to never be a victim again. But how could I do this?

Every once in a while, during that time, some good, happy memory of my mother would sneak into my mind. All kinds of things triggered these memories, and they came more and more often, as time went on. Sometimes, I would enjoy the memory, revel in it, and feel my mother near me. I was able to do that without letting the negative thoughts in, for longer and longer moments. I didn’t let anything–not that she was really not here with me, or the circumstances of her death, or that her murderer was walking around free, intrude on my memories of her.

At first, I did this by force of will, because it was so wonderful to have those pain-free moments, and force-of-will was the only way I knew. Then I realized that no matter how many good moments popped into my mind, there were only a few things that could spoil them—that she was gone, that she was brutally murdered, and that the man who murdered her served only a few years of his 27-years-to-life sentence. Thinking about these few things were mostly all that interfered with my healing and my resolve to not be a victim.

It slowly dawned on me that: 1.) I could do nothing about these things. They were all facts over which I had absolutely no control or influence. 2.) I could never have my mother back. 3 ) I had 32 years of memories, good and bad, happy and sad, but always loving, of my mother, and those three things about her death were all that stood in the way of my enriching my life, taking control of my life , and making a better life for my children. I resolved then that what I wanted to focus on was all the time of my mother’s life —her 53 years of living, not the last few horrible moments of her life.

Once I understood this, I stopped being a victim of my mother’s murderer, and was better able to focus on her life and all that she meant to me. Her life, not her death, became the important fact of her existence here. I made the conscious choice that I would focus my attention on her life, not her death. I never stopped realizing that she was dead, but I came to realize it was her life that was important, not the circumstances of her death. Once I did this I was able to grieve and to move forward.

Now, back to why it is so difficult to do abolition work as a victim family member. When I speak as a victim family member, I mostly talk about my mother’s death and the period after her death that had to do with her having been murdered. My purpose in speaking out is to say that the death penalty is of no use or help to victim family members and that it in fact, often hurts and victimizes them further. So, in effect, I’m focusing on my mother’s death, not her life.

This is completely opposite to the way I’ve chosen to live my life. I must abandon the mindset and way of thinking that gives me comfort, hope, and peace and go to the place that causes me upset, despair, pain and anger. It’s a difficult place to get back from. There is a way back, but it takes time and work. It’s a process of recovery. I’m glad to say that it is a little easier to come back each time, but I think that , like grief, the need for recovery will always be there.

Traveling around southern Montana with the Coalition folks, talking to groups and people was a wonderful, but emotionally costly experience. Being with like-minded, committed, caring and passionate folks is a great comfort. It makes it possible to do the work, push aside the pain for later, and stay focused on the goal. The members and supporters of the Montana Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty are terrific people who treated me royally, and their concern and consideration was like a warm fuzzy blanket. Thank you, all.

I don’t know, except in the most general way, how difficult speaking out about the murder of a loved-one is for other victim family members. I suspect that some have reactions similar to mine, and that it causes a different pain for others. I don’t know how any of them actually cope with dealing with the cost of speaking out, but I am certain that it is not easy for any of us. I do it to honor my mother, and her life. I suspect some others also see it as a way to honor their murdered loved-one.

Won’t it be wonderful when victim family members all over the country can focus on their lives and the lives of their murdered loved ones, grieve properly, and move forward without the burden of a long, drawn-out legal process that re-victimizes them, sometimes for decades? Won’t it be wonderful when the country spends the money they formerly spent on the death penalty on preventing crime and helping victims? And won’t it be wonderful when there is no need for victim family members to speak out about the problems of the death penalty? I can hardly wait.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Promise?

Last week there was an article in my local paper, Connecticut’s victim’s advocate continues to fight against governor’s early release program . This is the same program that my former State Senator, Andrew Roraback, cited as his reason for changing his long-held record of voting for the abolition of the death penalty.

Senator Roraback wanted this program done away with, and was willing to hold hostage his vote on the repeal of the death penalty. Because the vote to get rid of the program failed, he voted against repealing the death penalty. This was completely out of character, and the opposite of his votes against the death penalty in all previous sessions.

The Victim Advocate has also chosen to get involved in this issue. She is also opposed to this program, and I’m not sure her stance is right for her office.

And three Republican legislators started a petition last month to suspend the program.

My understanding of the program, the Earned Risk Reduction Program, is prisoners can earn time off their sentences (up to five days per month) by good behavior, and by participating in certain programs offered in the prisons, designed to prepare the prisoner for life outside the prison. Other states that have instituted similar plans have seen a reduction in their recidivism and crime rates. Isn’t a reduction in recidivism and crime rates a good thing?

Prisoners have been able to informally earn time off for good behavior for some time, as have they been able to earn time off for participating in programs designed to reduce recidivism. I think this program only formalizes an already-existing practice, and adds some helpful new programs.

These programs are specifically set up to help in an inmate’s re-entry into the world outside the prison. The programs include substance abuse counseling, mental health treatment, parenting classes, and a GED or skills in a particular trade. They give the offender tools that enable him or her to more successfully re-enter society. One of the goals of the correctional system is rehabilitation. These programs are a step toward that goal. Knowing that he or she can shorten the incarceration time gives the inmate an incentive to take part in the programs. They are motivated to take part in programs that are in the interest of society because the programs lower the risk of re-offending. Isn’t lower risk of re-offending a good thing?

As I said earlier, these programs have been available for some time. It seems that this new addition to the programs is much fairer in that it clearly states what the prisoner must do to earn a specific amount of time off his or her sentence.

Prisoners have always been able to get their sentences reduced, and those who hoot and holler about promises to the victims not being kept are being disingenuous. A sentence of a certain term is never a promise, and if it has ever been presented as a promise, shame on the person who made the promise. Parole hearings are held all the time, and prisoners can “earn” time off for good behavior. In addition, there are other “special circumstances” that enable the early release of certain prisoners. I know this from my experience. The man who murdered my mother was sentenced to 26 years to life. He served fewer than five years. He was released because of ill-health and went on to live for many more years. This all happened more than 20 years ago, before the program in question was instituted, back when a sentence was supposedly a promise.

We cannot make promises to victims about the length of time their offender will serve in prison, except for mandatory minimum sentences (? see my experience with mandatory minimum sentence, above). Any such promises are lies, and have always been lies. The length of the served sentence is up to the Department of Corrections. The DOC must follow the law, and do its best to prevent the prisoners it releases from re-offending. They work to rehabilitate the men and women in their care. That is their mission and the only promise that can be made about the length of a sentence. The new program is run and monitored by the Commissioner of Corrections and a Corrections Committee. They are in the best position to assess the inmate’s behavior so they are the ones to give incentives by way of credits, when they think they are warranted—as outlined in the program.

I think these three Republicans, Senator Roraback, and the Victim’s Advocate may all be mistaken about this program, and more importantly they may all be mistaken about the idea of a sentence handed down being a promise. It really is not a promise. It is possible that the program can be improved, but from what I can see of it, it is only formalizing already-existing practice. Isn’t clarity of responsibility and expectations a good thing? I think it is far better than making “promises” that cannot be kept.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Victim Rights

One of the reasons that Connecticut was able to repeal the death penalty was the testimony of victim family members who spoke to the harm that the death penalty causes victims. We detailed, in our testimonies, many of the ways the death penalty failed us, and sometimes even victimized us. Any one of us would give almost anything and everything to have our loved-one back with us. Since that is the only consolation that is impossible, we hope for a Connecticut that is more just and compassionate, and we seek to lessen the pain of other victim families.

Last month, Governor Christie, of New Jersey, signed the enhanced “Crime Victims’ Bill of Rights” legislation into law. (You can see the Bill of Rights here.) As victim family members, we know that now is the time for Connecticut to begin improving our state’s victim rights.

Article XXIX of the Connecticut Constitution concerns victim rights in our state. (You can read it at this link.) It is a document that outlines, in broad strokes, the rights and services available. We need to encourage the legislature to: 1) amend the articles to state victim rights more specifically, and 2) provide added funding to enable the responsible agencies have the resources needed to deliver the services.

Many victim family members are not aware of their rights as victims of crime. Many are unable to find the strength, during their bereavement, to take the steps necessary to take advantage of their rights. Compassion and justice for victim family members is often only available to those victims who are able to demand it.

Victim family members should not have to demand justice and compassion from the State of Connecticut. It should be readily available, in our name, as citizens of a just and compassionate state. Additional funding is needed. A victim advocate should be present and available for every victim, or standing in for every victim, at every step of the process, from the time of the crime for as long as the victim chooses; even the entire lifetime of the victim.

I hope that the Connecticut State Legislature will consider strengthening our Victim Bill of Rights, as New Jersey has, and include added funding so the Victim Bill of Rights will be a vital, functioning arm of our Judicial system, and a real help to our victim family members.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Post from NYADP

Today I received a copy of a post from the NYADP (New Yorkers for Alternatives to the Death Penalty) Journal. It looks beyond the death penalty, and its impact on victim family members. I think it is exactly the kind of examination many Connecticut victim family members are now doing, since the repeal of the death penalty in our state. You can read the post here.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

This Blog Will Continue

Since the day the governor signed the bill to repeal the death penalty here in Connecticut, I’ve been thinking about what to do about this blog.

On the one hand, it seemed silly to have a blog about murder victim family members talking about their opposition to the death penalty in Connecticut, when Connecticut has repealed the death penalty. But, it seems as though repealing the death penalty is just the beginning for some of us. Many of the concerns we’ve shared as victims remain entrenched in the criminal justice system, and in our society .

As victim’s family members we sought justice and fairness. We sought a system that valued justice and fairness and that treated all of us with compassion, decency, and humanity. We wanted justice to be blind to gender, religion, race, color and economic status. We wanted the focus of our state budget for the criminal justice system to shift so that the victims had more—more support, more services, and more help.

I know that I was elated as I watched the governor sign the repeal bill on April 25, 2012. I will never forget that experience and the pride I felt as a citizen of Connecticut.

But there is still much to be done to improve the current system, especially for victims and their families. We have made an outstanding, excellent beginning with our repeal work, but for many of us, it’s just one victory in a long line of changes that must be made to make the system do what we believe it should do for victims—to treat them, always, with respect, compassion, and fairness; to do justice; and to make the victims as whole again as is possible.

I will continue this blog. I will continue to welcome postings from victim family members, and others, on the topic of victim rights, victim treatment, or anything else you think is relevant to the purpose of the blog. I would also welcome any suggestions on making the blog relevant and helpful for victims. Finally, I would like to help repeal efforts in other states, and welcome news from those fronts.

Please write if you have any questions, ideas, advice, or other thoughts. I think there is much still to be done for and by victims and victim family members.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

A Graphic About Incarceration.

One of the topics we victims talked about on this blog and in other public forums was the cost to Connecticut of a death penalty case.

I recently was contacted by OnlineCriminalJusticeDegree.com with a graphic that shows, comparatively, what is spent on prisons and incarcerations vs. what is spent on education and other beneficial social programs. The graphic deals with much more than the death penalty, but illustrates and validates much of what we have been saying.

It also says much more and gives inspiration those of us who don’t see the abolition of the death penalty in Connecticut as the end of our work for justice and decent treatment for all Connecticut citizens.

Many thanks to The Online Criminal Justice Degree Project for this:

No Justice For All
Created by: OnlineCriminalJusticeDegree.com informative and eye-opening graphic.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment